IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v105y2015icp157-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing order constraints: Qualitative differences between Bayes factors and normalized maximum likelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Heck, Daniel W.
  • Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
  • Morey, Richard D.

Abstract

We compared Bayes factors to normalized maximum likelihood for the simple case of selecting between an order-constrained versus a full binomial model. This comparison revealed two qualitative differences in testing order constraints regarding data dependence and model preference.

Suggested Citation

  • Heck, Daniel W. & Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan & Morey, Richard D., 2015. "Testing order constraints: Qualitative differences between Bayes factors and normalized maximum likelihood," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 157-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:105:y:2015:i:c:p:157-162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2015.06.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016771521500200X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2015.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klugkist, Irene & Hoijtink, Herbert, 2007. "The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6367-6379, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Thielmann & Daniel W. Heck & Benjamin E. Hilbig, 2016. "Anonymity and incentives: An investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(5), pages 527-536, September.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:6:p:563-571 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:5:p:527-536 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sina A. Klein & Isabel Thielmann & Benjamin E. Hilbig & Ingo Zettler, 2017. "Between me and we: The importance of self-profit versus social justifiability for ethical decision making," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(6), pages 563-571, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Paul Fox & Joris Mulder & Sandip Sinharay, 2017. "Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 979-1006, December.
    2. Muye Chen & Michel Regenwetter & Clintin P. Davis-Stober, 2021. "Collective Choice May Tell Nothing About Anyone’s Individual Preferences," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Guido Consonni & Roberta Paroli, 2017. "Objective Bayesian Comparison of Constrained Analysis of Variance Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 589-609, September.
    4. repec:jss:jstsof:46:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i08 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kuiper, Rebecca M. & Klugkist, Irene & Hoijtink, Herbert, 2010. "A Fortran 90 Program for Confirmatory Analysis of Variance," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 34(i08).
    7. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian test on equality of score parameters in the order restricted RC association model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 147-157.
    8. Herbert Hoijtink, 2013. "Objective Bayes Factors for Inequality Constrained Hypotheses," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(2), pages 207-229, August.
    9. Andr'es Ram'irez-Hassan & Alejandro L'opez-Vera, 2021. "Semi-parametric estimation of the EASI model: Welfare implications of taxes identifying clusters due to unobserved preference heterogeneity," Papers 2109.07646, arXiv.org.
    10. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian comparison of models with inequality and equality constraints," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-182.
    11. Bartolucci, Francesco & Scaccia, Luisa & Farcomeni, Alessio, 2012. "Bayesian inference through encompassing priors and importance sampling for a class of marginal models for categorical data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4067-4080.
    12. Joris Mulder & James O. Berger & Víctor Peña & M. J. Bayarri, 2021. "On the prevalence of information inconsistency in normal linear models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 103-132, March.
    13. Mulder, Joris, 2014. "Prior adjusted default Bayes factors for testing (in)equality constrained hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 448-463.
    14. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2017. "Exact One-Sided Bayes Factors for 2 by 2 Contingency Tables," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(3), pages 465-472, October.
    15. Wetzels, Ruud & Grasman, Raoul P.P.P. & Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, 2010. "An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2094-2102, September.
    16. Roberta Paroli & Guido Consonni, 2020. "Objective Bayesian comparison of order-constrained models in contingency tables," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 139-165, March.
    17. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2022. "Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1214-1237, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:105:y:2015:i:c:p:157-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.