IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v101y2015icp21-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the construction of nested Archimedean copulas for d-monotone generators

Author

Listed:
  • Rezapour, Mohsen

Abstract

Following McNeil and Nešlehová (2009), we present some weaker conditions under which a partially nested Archimedean copula with arbitrary nesting levels is still a copula. Relaxing the conditions on the generators enable researchers to model data sets more efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Rezapour, Mohsen, 2015. "On the construction of nested Archimedean copulas for d-monotone generators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 21-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:101:y:2015:i:c:p:21-32
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2015.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715215000814
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2015.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hofert, Marius & Pham, David, 2013. "Densities of nested Archimedean copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 37-52.
    2. Genest, Christian & Rémillard, Bruno & Beaudoin, David, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 199-213, April.
    3. Fermanian, Jean-David, 2005. "Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 119-152, July.
    4. Rezapour, Mohsen & Alamatsaz, Mohammad Hossein, 2014. "Stochastic comparison of lifetimes of two (n−k+1)-out-of-n systems with heterogeneous dependent components," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 240-251.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uyttendaele, Nathan, 2016. "On the estimation of nested Archimedean copulas: A theoretical and an experimental comparison," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016005, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Ostap Okhrin & Alexander Ristig & Jeffrey Sheen & Stefan Trück, 2015. "Conditional Systemic Risk with Penalized Copula," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2015-038, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    3. Nathan Uyttendaele, 2018. "On the estimation of nested Archimedean copulas: a theoretical and an experimental comparison," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 1047-1070, June.
    4. Mai Jan-Frederik, 2019. "Simulation algorithms for hierarchical Archimedean copulas beyond the completely monotone case," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 202-214, January.
    5. Ressel Paul, 2019. "Copulas, stable tail dependence functions, and multivariate monotonicity," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 247-258, January.
    6. Górecki J. & Hofert M. & Holeňa M., 2017. "Kendall’s tau and agglomerative clustering for structure determination of hierarchical Archimedean copulas," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 75-87, January.
    7. Górecki, Jan & Hofert, Marius & Okhrin, Ostap, 2021. "Outer power transformations of hierarchical Archimedean copulas: Construction, sampling and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Huang & Haiming Zhou & Nader Ebrahimi, 2022. "Bayesian Bivariate Cure Rate Models Using Copula Functions," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Gaißer, Sandra & Schmid, Friedrich, 2010. "On testing equality of pairwise rank correlations in a multivariate random vector," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(10), pages 2598-2615, November.
    3. Wanling Huang & Artem Prokhorov, 2014. "A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 751-771, October.
    4. Xun Lu & Kin Lai & Liang Liang, 2014. "Portfolio value-at-risk estimation in energy futures markets with time-varying copula-GARCH model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 333-357, August.
    5. Can, S.U. & Einmahl, John & Laeven, R.J.A., 2020. "Goodness-of-fit testing for copulas: A distribution-free approach," Other publications TiSEM 211b2be9-b46e-41e2-9b95-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Derumigny Alexis & Fermanian Jean-David, 2017. "About tests of the “simplifying” assumption for conditional copulas," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 154-197, August.
    7. Kajal Lahiri & Liu Yang, 2023. "Predicting binary outcomes based on the pair-copula construction," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 3089-3119, June.
    8. Daniel Berg & Jean‐François Quessy, 2009. "Local Power Analyses of Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Copulas," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 389-412, September.
    9. Jean-David Fermanian, 2012. "An overview of the goodness-of-fit test problem for copulas," Papers 1211.4416, arXiv.org.
    10. Zhang, Shulin & Okhrin, Ostap & Zhou, Qian M. & Song, Peter X.-K., 2016. "Goodness-of-fit test for specification of semiparametric copula dependence models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 215-233.
    11. Dante Amengual & Enrique Sentana, 2020. "Is a Normal Copula the Right Copula?," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 350-366, April.
    12. Lu, Xiaohui & Zheng, Xu, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for copulas based on martingale transformation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 84-117.
    13. Gregor Weiß, 2011. "Copula parameter estimation by maximum-likelihood and minimum-distance estimators: a simulation study," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 31-54, March.
    14. Can, S.U. & Einmahl, John & Laeven, R.J.A., 2017. "Asymptotically Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Copulas," Discussion Paper 2017-052, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Sarazin, Gabriel & Morio, Jérôme & Lagnoux, Agnès & Balesdent, Mathieu & Brevault, Loïc, 2021. "Reliability-oriented sensitivity analysis in presence of data-driven epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Bücher, Axel & Dette, Holger, 2010. "Some comments on goodness-of-fit tests for the parametric form of the copula based on L2-distances," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 749-763, March.
    17. Svetlana Gribkova & Olivier Lopez, 2015. "Non-parametric Copula Estimation Under Bivariate Censoring," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 925-946, December.
    18. Genest, Christian & Masiello, Esterina & Tribouley, Karine, 2009. "Estimating copula densities through wavelets," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 170-181, April.
    19. Echaust, Krzysztof, 2021. "Asymmetric tail dependence between stock market returns and implied volatility," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:101:y:2015:i:c:p:21-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.