IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i2p301-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination

Author

Listed:
  • Grace, Victoria M.
  • Daniels, Ken R.
  • Gillett, Wayne

Abstract

Current international policy trends in the field of medically assisted conception are moving towards increased openness of information regarding the nature of conception where donated gametes are involved. In the case of donor insemination this means that the donor is no longer anonymous, offspring have the right to access information about the donor's identity, and parents are encouraged to tell children the nature of their donor-assisted conception. Until recently, however, the practice of donor insemination has tended to create the conditions for ignoring, or erasing, the existence of the donor as the provider of the gametes. Changing policy creates numerous challenges to this erasure, and to traditional conceptualisations of the father. This research is based on analysis of the narratives of a group of 41 New Zealand couples who conceived children with the assistance of donor insemination 15-18 years prior. This article focuses on their talk about the donor. The parents' negation of the donor supports the normative formation of 'family', and is in turn supported by an instrumental and de-personalising discourse in relation to the donor. A tension is created within the parents' talk whereby donors are negated and yet simultaneously appear as persons. We explore this discursive construction, suggesting that a new framework for thinking about donated gametes and the role of the donor is influencing parents' narrations and understandings of family. We discuss these influences and examine their implications, particularly with respect to a separation of the bio-genetic from the social-environmental.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace, Victoria M. & Daniels, Ken R. & Gillett, Wayne, 2008. "The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents' constructions in the case of donor insemination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 301-314, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:2:p:301-314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00481-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, Gay & Butler, Anneliese & Nachtigall, Robert D., 2005. "Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1300-1309, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hertz, Rosanna & Nelson, Margaret K. & Kramer, Wendy, 2013. "Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: The relevance of age, awareness, and family form," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 52-65.
    2. Nordqvist, Petra, 2011. "Choreographies of sperm donations: Dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(11), pages 1661-1668.
    3. Hertz, Rosanna & Nelson, Margaret K. & Kramer, Wendy, 2015. "Gendering gametes: The unequal contributions of sperm and egg donors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 10-19.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicky Hudson, 2017. "Making ‘Assisted World Families’? Parenting Projects and Family Practices in the Context of Globalised Gamete Donation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(2), pages 48-58, May.
    2. Friese, Carrie & Becker, Gay & Nachtigall, Robert D., 2006. "Rethinking the biological clock: Eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms and meanings of age-related infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1550-1560, September.
    3. Stephen Whyte & Benno Torgler, 2015. "Selection criteria in the search for a sperm donor: behavioural traits versus physical appearance," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 151-171, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:2:p:301-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.