IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v65y2007i3p518-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The will-to-live and survival at old age: Gender differences

Author

Listed:
  • Carmel, Sara
  • Baron-Epel, Orna
  • Shemy, Galia

Abstract

In a previous study, the will-to-live (WTL) was presented as a parsimonious and easy to use indicator of well-being, perceived differently by men and women. This study evaluates the role of WTL in long-term survival of elderly men and women. In 1994, socio-demographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics were collected from a sample of 1138 Israeli elderly persons (70+) by structured interviews. Data regarding survival were gathered 7.5 years later. Results indicated that WTL was significantly related to survival in univariate analyses. However, in multivariate Cox analyses, conducted separately on men and women, the will-to-live predicted survival only among women after adjusting for age, self-rated health (SRH) and psychosocial variables, so that the stronger the WTL, the higher the chances of survival for women. Age, WTL and SRH were the only statistically significant predictors of survival in women. Survival of men was predicted by age, daily functioning, SRH, working outside home or volunteering, and self-esteem. Our findings show that the WTL predicts long-term survival among elderly women, and therefore has a prognostic value. This strengthens its previously presented importance as a generalized indicator of well-being. These findings have practical implications for formal and informal caregivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmel, Sara & Baron-Epel, Orna & Shemy, Galia, 2007. "The will-to-live and survival at old age: Gender differences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 518-523, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:518-523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00162-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmel, Sara & Mutran, Elizabeth, 1997. "Wishes regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments among elderly persons in Israel: An explanatory model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 1715-1727, December.
    2. Carmel, Sara, 2001. "The will to live: gender differences among elderly persons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 949-958, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dana Anaby & Tal Jarus & Bruno Zumbo, 2010. "Psychometric Evaluation of the Hebrew Language Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 267-274, April.
    2. Racheli-Lital Gvili & Ehud Bodner, 2021. "Ageist Attitudes Are Associated with Will-to-Live and Moderated by Age, Medical Conditions and Attitudes toward Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Joana Neto & Marta Pinto da Costa & Félix Neto & Sara Carmel, 2021. "The Will-to-Live Scale: Validity and Reliability Among Portuguese Adolescents," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Racheli-Lital Gvili & Ehud Bodner, 2021. "Ageist Attitudes Are Associated with Will-to-Live and Moderated by Age, Medical Conditions and Attitudes toward Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Joana Neto & Marta Pinto da Costa & Félix Neto & Sara Carmel, 2021. "The Will-to-Live Scale: Validity and Reliability Among Portuguese Adolescents," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Lee Greenblatt-Kimron & Miri Kestler-Peleg & Ahuva Even-Zohar & Osnat Lavenda, 2021. "Death Anxiety and Loneliness among Older Adults: Role of Parental Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Vandrevala, Tushna & Hampson, Sarah E. & Daly, Tom & Arber, Sara & Thomas, Hilary, 2006. "Dilemmas in decision-making about resuscitation--a focus group study of older people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1579-1593, April.
    5. López Ulloa, Beatriz Fabiola & Møller, Valerie & Sousa-Poza, Alfonso, 2013. "How does subjective well-being evolve with age? A literature review," FZID Discussion Papers 72-2013, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    6. Nissim, Rinat & Gagliese, Lucia & Rodin, Gary, 2009. "The desire for hastened death in individuals with advanced cancer: A longitudinal qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 165-171, July.
    7. Lang, Alexander & Frankus, Elisabeth & Heimerl, Katharina, 2022. "The perspective of professional caregivers working in generalist palliative care on ‘good dying’: An integrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:3:p:518-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.