IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i7p1757-1767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unfulfilled expectations: How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices

Author

Listed:
  • Porter, Maureen
  • Bhattacharya, Siladitya
  • van Teijlingen, Edwin

Abstract

Throughout Europe women are having fewer babies, but more of them are being delivered by caesarean section. There is some evidence that this major surgical procedure discourages women and/or their partners from having further children. This study is aimed at ascertaining the extent to which mode of delivery in first confinement affected women's decision-making about having another child. This paper reports results from (1) a questionnaire sent to 5300 women who delivered their first baby in Aberdeen in northeast Scotland between 1980 and 1995, but who did not have another viable pregnancy within 5 years, and (2) in-depth interviews with a stratified random sample of 82 of these respondents which covered experiences of birth, decision-making about subsequent pregnancies and infertility. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically. Questionnaires were returned by 3204 women (60%). Among those who had no further pregnancies, 1182 (71%) had deliberately limited their fertility. Of those who had a second child, 696 (66%) deliberately left a gap of 5 or more years between them. The factors which apparently influenced the decision to limit fertility included early intention, experience of the first, or index birth, health, lifestyle, influence of partner, age, first child and fertility problems. In interviews, women presented these factors as constraints on their behaviour, which restrained them from freely choosing to have more children and in some cases to have the number they had planned. As the decision to have only one child or to leave a large gap between children is unusual, women may have been presenting their choices in this way to make their actions appear more socially acceptable and their motivations as blameless.

Suggested Citation

  • Porter, Maureen & Bhattacharya, Siladitya & van Teijlingen, Edwin, 2006. "Unfulfilled expectations: How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1757-1767, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:7:p:1757-1767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00465-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whiteford, Linda M. & Gonzalez, Lois, 1995. "Stigma: The hidden burden of infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 27-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donkor, Ernestina S. & Sandall, Jane, 2007. "The impact of perceived stigma and mediating social factors on infertility-related stress among women seeking infertility treatment in Southern Ghana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1683-1694, October.
    2. Engman, Athena, 2019. "Embodiment and the foundation of biographical disruption," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 120-127.
    3. Alicja Malina & Dorota Suwalska-Barancewicz, 2021. "Comparison of Early-Stage Mothers and Childless Women Seeking Pregnancy: Experienced Stress, Resilience and Satisfaction with Relationship with the Partner," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Nahar, Papreen, 2010. "Health seeking behaviour of childless women in Bangladesh: An ethnographic exploration for the special issue on: Loss in child bearing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1780-1787, November.
    5. Bell, Ann V., 2016. "The margins of medicalization: Diversity and context through the case of infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 39-46.
    6. Laya Farzadi & Aliyeh Ghasemzadeh & Zahra Bahrami-asl & Hossein Shirdel, 2015. "Predictors of Irrational Parenthood Cognitions in an Iranian Group of Infertile Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-7, March.
    7. Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Desperately seeking parenthood: neonatal nurses reflect on parental anguish," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1885-1894, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:7:p:1757-1767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.