IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i9p1949-1959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doing criticism in 'symbiotic niceness': a study of palliative care nurses' talk

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Sarah

Abstract

This paper examines how palliative care nurses do criticism of other professionals in talk within settings for care of the dying (two hospices and one general hospital). Strategies for the production of moral identities include the use of direct criticism, indirect criticism and quoted speech, hence 'inverted comma criticism'. Criticism is done through the construction and reconstruction of 'atrocity stories'. Atrocity stories are used as a medium by nurses to express their opinions and feelings about doctors who might have behaved insensitively. At the same time, it allows doctors to redeem themselves. The analysis of talk reveals that the voices of absent patients are reactivated and co-opted into the nurses' talk. The stories serve to produce an image of nurses as caring, morally responsible patient advocates and loyal characters to their medical colleagues. Through the analysis of talk, the communication skills and strategies for the maintenance of interactional order are made visible and displayed. Skills for the production of the palliative care team work are also made visible. Emotional labour is analysed as a project for the production of particular kinds of niceness which in turn require particular types of emotional labour. This paper argues that educators should aim to identify and make conscious use of nurses' own available interactional skills, and focus on valuable cultural (rules of decorum) and material resources (the disease process) which are readily available and accessible for nurses, as a starting point in communication training. The theory of an account of co-production of niceness which benefits each other, hence, symbiotic niceness, reveals that being nice to each other can be rewarding and therapeutic in that it helps to smooth, distance and ameliorate problems occurring in the reality of palliative care nurses' and their patients' life-worlds.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Sarah, 2005. "Doing criticism in 'symbiotic niceness': a study of palliative care nurses' talk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 1949-1959, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:9:p:1949-1959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00471-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:9:p:1949-1959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.