IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i3p627-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Injury recurrence among untreated and medically treated victims of violence in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Gallagher, Catherine A.

Abstract

Studies on the risk of intentional re-injury tend to use samples of admissions to hospitals and conclude that prior intentional injury is predictive of future such admissions. Limiting samples to persons receiving medical attention misses the equally important population of those intentionally injured but not receiving medical attention. Approximately 2 million violence-related injuries go medically unevaluated each year in the United States. A significant portion of these are severe. Including this population captures the dark figure of untreated intentional injury and allows for the estimation of the effects of medical intervention on future risk. This paper tests the hypothesis that those going without medical evaluation will have higher odds of injury recurrence than the traditionally studied population of those receiving health care. Data are drawn from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), an ongoing and nationally representative longitudinal survey of households in the United States. The NCVS collects information at the household and person-level, and when victimization is identified through screener questions, at the incident-level. In addition to capturing crime and violence reported to the police and medical professionals, this methodology captures incidents that go unreported and untreated. Controlling for correlates of violence and reinjury, persons injured in violent events receiving medical attention alone, or in combination with police notification, are at substantially lower risk of incurring future violence and violence-related injuries than persons injured but not receiving medical or police attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Gallagher, Catherine A., 2005. "Injury recurrence among untreated and medically treated victims of violence in the USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 627-635, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:3:p:627-635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00270-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:3:p:627-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.