IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i6p773-795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic development and women's blood pressure: field evidence from rural Mashonaland, Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Hunter, John M.
  • Sparks, Barbara T.
  • Mufunda, Jacob
  • Musabayane, Cephas T.
  • Sparks, Harvey V.
  • Mahomed, Kassam

Abstract

A survey of 515 non-pregnant women at 12 geographically chosen research sites in rural Mashonaland shows significant differences in mean blood pressure, controlled by age cohorts. Three levels of economic development are identified: (1) the traditional economy on communal lands, with lowest blood pressure, (2) the wage economy in areas of large-scale commercial agriculture, with elevated blood pressure and (3) the wage economy in mining areas, with the highest elevation of blood pressure. The area is dominated by the primate city, Harare, up to distances of 300 km and beyond, from which forces of change and modernization emanate. It is seen that potassium, sodium and the sodium-potassium ratio, are distance-related to Harare and that women's blood pressures tend to follow suit. The rise of body sodium in young persons at risk, often accompanied by declining potassium intake and other changes of modernization, suggest that more attention should be focused on rural areas in Africa, now in the throes of economic change.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunter, John M. & Sparks, Barbara T. & Mufunda, Jacob & Musabayane, Cephas T. & Sparks, Harvey V. & Mahomed, Kassam, 2000. "Economic development and women's blood pressure: field evidence from rural Mashonaland, Zimbabwe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 773-795, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:6:p:773-795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00303-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:6:p:773-795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.