IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i7p933-941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening

Author

Listed:
  • Bruyninckx, Eva
  • Mortelmans, Dimitri
  • Van Goethem, M.
  • Van Hove, E.

Abstract

Mammography is an important tool in the secondary prevention of breast cancer. However, earlier research has pointed out that an unpleasant experience during a previous mammography can deter women from returning for mammography screening. It is known that mammography can be a painful examination for some women. The research presented in this article focuses on the experience of pain during and after mammography (247 patients). Firstly, the study sets out to determine the extent to which women actually experience pain as a result of mammographic examination. Secondly, it focuses on identifying the factors that determine the risk of a painful experience during the screening procedure. A pain model was developed that takes into account a broad range of potential pain factors, including other than woman-related factors and factors associated with the actual examination. Special attention was paid to the examination context, the mammographic procedure and the screening staff. The research results show that the majority of women experience pain during mammography. With a logistic regression a number of women-related factors, staff-related and procedural factors were found significant in assessing the pain risk during mammography.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruyninckx, Eva & Mortelmans, Dimitri & Van Goethem, M. & Van Hove, E., 1999. "Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(7), pages 933-941, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:7:p:933-941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00181-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:7:p:933-941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.