IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v48y1999i12p1851-1856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The health impact of smoking in manual and non-manual social class men and women: a test of the Blaxter hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J.
  • Davey Smith, George
  • Hart, Carole L.

Abstract

Blaxter has hypothesized that harmful behavioral habits like smoking have a greater impact on health in the non-manual than in the manual social classes, possibly because other adverse exposures have a more important role in the manual social classes. However, the outcome measure used was a composite measure of physiological indices of morbidity and the relevance of this to other health problems is uncertain. We have therefore investigated the effect of smoking on mortality, to test whether the risk of death associated with smoking differs between manual and non-manual social classes. Data on 6831 men and 7993 women, aged 45-64 when screened in the Renfrew and Paisley study, a large prospective observational study in the West of Scotland, have been analyzed. All cause mortality rate ratios for smokers compared with never smokers have been calculated within manual and non-manual social classes. Although the age adjusted rate ratios are slightly higher among the non-manual men and women (2.19 [1.83-2.61] versus 1.92 [1.71-2.17] for non-manual and manual men respectively, and 1.75 [1.54-1.99] versus 1.65 [1.50-1.82] for non-manual and manual women), this difference between social classes is not statistically significant (p-values for test of difference 0.26 and 0.47 for men and women respectively). When additionally adjusted for other risk factors, cardiorespiratory symptoms and deprivation, this picture remained the same (p-values for test of difference are 0.41 and 0.50 for men and women respectively). Similar results were found when the cohort was divided by deprivation categories rather than social classes or when smoking related mortality rather than mortality from all causes was used as the outcome measure. We therefore conclude that the health impact of smoking is similar in each socio-economic group. The relative health improvement consequent on smoking cessation is thus similar in different socio-economic groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. & Davey Smith, George & Hart, Carole L., 1999. "The health impact of smoking in manual and non-manual social class men and women: a test of the Blaxter hypothesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(12), pages 1851-1856, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:48:y:1999:i:12:p:1851-1856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00071-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaochang Yan & Lu Chen & Hua Yan, 2019. "Socio-economic status, visual impairment and the mediating role of lifestyles in developed rural areas of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Birch, Stephen & Jerrett, Michael & Wilson, Kathi & Law, Michael & Elliott, Susan & Eyles, John, 2005. "Heterogeneities in the production of health: smoking, health status and place," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 301-310, June.
    3. Schafer, Markus H. & Ferraro, Kenneth F., 2011. "Distal and variably proximal causes: Education, obesity, and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1340-1348.
    4. Charafeddine, Rana & Van Oyen, Herman & Demarest, Stefaan, 2012. "Does the association between smoking and mortality differ by educational level?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(9), pages 1402-1406.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:48:y:1999:i:12:p:1851-1856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.