IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v47y1998i2p243-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health appraisal models in multiple sclerosis

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, Greg
  • Stuifbergen, Alexa K.

Abstract

This study used multi-group path analysis to test the hypothesis that disability's total effect on self-rated health differs for different-aged persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Data (n=806) collected as part of a larger study examining quality of life for persons with MS were used to construct and compare models of health appraisal for three age groups, 18 to 45 (n=347), 46 to 60 (n=339), and 61 to 78 (n=120). The results suggest that while the same general model describes health appraisal in each age group, disability's total effect on self-rated health is less in the older and middle-aged groups than in the youngest group. Further, disability's direct effect, rather than the hypothesized indirect effects, accounts for the group differences. The findings support the other work in this area suggesting that age may moderate the effect of "objective" health status on self-rated health. The generally surprising finding was the "break point" for this effect -- contrary to other research that suggests older persons may differ from other-aged individuals, in this sample of persons with MS, the youngest group differed from the others. These results are discussed in terms of MS specifically and health appraisal more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, Greg & Stuifbergen, Alexa K., 1998. "Health appraisal models in multiple sclerosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 243-253, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:2:p:243-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00080-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:2:p:243-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.