IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46y1998i8p1043-1056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competing discourses of vital registration and personhood: perspectives from rural South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Jewkes, Rachel
  • Wood, Katharine

Abstract

Whilst birth and death data derived from civil registration systems are regarded as essential indicators of health status and important for population planning, in developing countries they are usually perceived by civil servants and researchers to be very incomplete. In South Africa in 1994 only 50% of deaths were registered and 18% of births in the first year of life. A rapid qualitative study was undertaken in a rural district of South Africa to ascertain why registration levels of births, still-births and infant deaths are so low. Fifty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 local Xhosa women and 33 "professional" key informants, ranging from local civil servants to hospital staff and grave diggers. The study found that local people had complex notions of personhood, before birth and in the years following. Personhood was viewed as a process rather than a stage which is achieved through live birth, as is implied in discourses of vital registration. The women interviewed knew about birth registration although most had registered some or none of their children; they did not know of death registration. There was little knowledge of why registration was necessary and perceptions of this among all informant groups mostly related to the need for a certificate to achieve something else, such as an identity document or welfare payment. Confusion about the procedures to be followed was found among both women and professionals, who advised them. In circumstances in which certificates were officially required, for school entry and burial, other documentation were reported to be accepted. This suggests that the dominance of vital registration as a means of establishing official identity was not recognized. Registration was regarded as a means of achieving something else rather than and end in itself, which discourses of statistical and juridical importance imply. In the light of this we suggest that the present system be replaced by one based on "passive" registration in health care settings if substantially greater levels of completeness are to be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Jewkes, Rachel & Wood, Katharine, 1998. "Competing discourses of vital registration and personhood: perspectives from rural South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1043-1056, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:8:p:1043-1056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)10036-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onarheim, Kristine Husøy & Sisay, Mitike Molla & Gizaw, Muluken & Moland, Karen Marie & Miljeteig, Ingrid, 2017. "What if the baby doesn't survive? Health-care decision making for ill newborns in Ethiopia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 123-130.
    2. Christou, Aliki & Alam, Ashraful & Hofiani, Sayed Murtaza Sadat & Rasooly, Mohammad Hafiz & Mubasher, Adela & Rashidi, Mohammad Khakerah & Dibley, Michael J. & Raynes-Greenow, Camille, 2019. "How community and healthcare provider perceptions, practices and experiences influence reporting, disclosure and data collection on stillbirth: Findings of a qualitative study in Afghanistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:8:p:1043-1056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.