IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i11p1669-1678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradoxes of GP fundholding: Contracting for community health services in the British National Health Service

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Gareth
  • Flynn, Rob
  • Pickard, Susan

Abstract

The expansion of GP fundholding (GPFH) is central to the British government's attempt to maintain the revolution under way in the National Health Service (NHS). Evaluations of the NHS reforms have portrayed GPFH as an important mechanism for competition, and GPFH's bargaining power is reported to have secured significant changes in health service provision. However, these developments have been acknowledged to be less applicable in relation to community health services (CHS) than acute hospital services. On the basis of case studies of the process of contracting for CHS, GPFHs are shown to display ambivalent and sometimes contradictory views which have to be related to broader policy developments in general practice and primary care. Although this paper focuses on the British situation, many of the issues raised by reforms in primary and community health services have implications for developments in other Western health care systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Gareth & Flynn, Rob & Pickard, Susan, 1997. "Paradoxes of GP fundholding: Contracting for community health services in the British National Health Service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 1669-1678, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1669-1678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00101-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:kap:iaecre:v:14:y:2008:i:1:p:65-75 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1669-1678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.