IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i11p1661-1668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limits of suffering: Critical care nurses' views of hospital care at the end of life

Author

Listed:
  • Asch, David A.
  • Shea, Judy A.
  • Jedrziewski, M. Kathryn
  • Bosk, Charles L.

Abstract

This study explores critical care nurses' beliefs, motivations, and experiences regarding end of life care. We performed a content analysis of the text comments provided by 468 U.S. critical care nurses in response to an anonymous mail survey about euthanasia. These comments reveal that these U.S. critical care nurses' feelings about issues surrounding the end of life are extremely complex. Eight themes emerged from 37 coded concepts, and the median number of themes volunteered per nurse was three. Among the most prevalent themes were patient concerns (53%), family concerns (33%), clinical circumstances (42%), the nurses' personal concerns (38%), and external or structural issues (68%). A profound sense of compassion and often conflicting forces were noted within and across themes. The nurses' comments offer a unique perspective on the care of critically ill patients and reveal much about that care that should be improved. In particular, (1) some nurses are frustrated about their limited role in the management of patients at the end of life, given their special understanding of these patients' experiences and wishes; (2) considerable confusion remains about the most appropriate way to care for these patients; and (3) the environment of some critical care settings may be unable to foster the compassion that many patients need.

Suggested Citation

  • Asch, David A. & Shea, Judy A. & Jedrziewski, M. Kathryn & Bosk, Charles L., 1997. "The limits of suffering: Critical care nurses' views of hospital care at the end of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 1661-1668, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1661-1668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00125-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1661-1668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.