IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v44y1997i8p1129-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with loss of ability: "Good grief" or episodic stress responses?

Author

Listed:
  • Hewson, Daphne

Abstract

Traditional grief models, which tend to prescribe "good grief" responses, are often applied to responses to loss of ability (loss of sensory, motor, intellectual or reproductive functioning). A brief review of relevant research concludes that the assumptions of grief models lack empirical support, both in the bereavement and the loss of ability contexts. It is argued that stress provides an appropriate framework for conceptualising loss of ability responses, especially the frequently observed recurrent pattern of stress (chronic sorrow). An Episodic Stress Response Model is proposed which avoids prescriptions and notions of pathology. It distinguishes between primary and secondary stress episodes and different types of stress demands (recognition, adjustment, comfort, and stress reduction).

Suggested Citation

  • Hewson, Daphne, 1997. "Coping with loss of ability: "Good grief" or episodic stress responses?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1129-1139, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:8:p:1129-1139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00244-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jenkins, Anna S. & Wiklund, Johan & Brundin, Ethel, 2014. "Individual responses to firm failure: Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 17-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:8:p:1129-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.