IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i2p265-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a psychosocial measurement model from stressful life events

Author

Listed:
  • Sheehan, T. Joseph

Abstract

Some have argued that failure to find evidence of a link between psychosocial stress factors and birth outcomes in humans may be attributed to a restriction in the range of measures used to characterize stress severity. This study describes the process of building and testing a measurement model from real life stressful experiences. To create a conceptual model, seven life events identified as stressful by successive samples of 3205 and 2090 Hartford inner city women between 1987 and 1992 and ten other experiences identified as potentially stressful were submitted to 10 academic colleagues and 4 health professionals associated with a preterm birth prevention project. Each rater attempted to identify a meaningful conceptual structure for clustering these psychosocial stressors. Seven of the thirteen proposed models were suitable for testing by means of structural equation modeling. Three models emerged as conceptually close and statistically acceptable with the number of information laden stressors dropping from 17 to 11 and clustering to form three latent variables representing economic, social support, and family stressors. The root mean square error of approximation was 0.03, where a value as low as 0.08 represents an adequate fit, and the generalized fit index was 0.99. The final model was cross-validated on the second sample where these and other fit indices were similar, indicating that a structurally meaningful measurement model fit the data well and could be used to investigate further the relationship of these theoretical variables to birth outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheehan, T. Joseph, 1996. "Creating a psychosocial measurement model from stressful life events," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 265-271, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:2:p:265-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00377-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:2:p:265-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.