IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i11p1543-1549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid prescribing change, how do patients respond?

Author

Listed:
  • Dowell, Jon S.
  • Snadden, David
  • Dunbar, James A.

Abstract

The cost of prescribed medication is an increasing burden on health care systems. British general practitioners have been encouraged to reduce their prescribing costs through financial incentives within the fundholding scheme. This study reports on one general practice which reduced prescribing expenditure as part of the move to fundholding. Interviews performed with practice staff and patients were analysed and combined with prescribing statistics and questionnaire data to give a picture of the balance between the experience of patients and practitioners. Fifty-three interviews with 17 patients revealed that most were willing to try cheaper treatments and that dissatisfaction was primarily with the communication they received rather than the change itself. Each patient had to decide how to respond to the change in their medication. The decision-making process and the main factors involved are described and discussed. The experience of having long-standing treatment changed can have an impact on the doctor-patient relationship. This was not found to be a large problem and, it is suggested, can be guarded against. Large-scale economies in prescribing are feasible for some practices, and patients will tolerate such changes if attention is paid to sensitive communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Dowell, Jon S. & Snadden, David & Dunbar, James A., 1996. "Rapid prescribing change, how do patients respond?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(11), pages 1543-1549, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:11:p:1543-1549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00050-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pound, Pandora & Britten, Nicky & Morgan, Myfanwy & Yardley, Lucy & Pope, Catherine & Daker-White, Gavin & Campbell, Rona, 2005. "Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 133-155, July.
    2. Paraponaris, A. & Verger, P. & Desquins, B. & Villani, P. & Bouvenot, G. & Rochaix, L. & Gourheux, J. C. & Moatti, J. P. AU -, 2004. "Delivering generics without regulatory incentives?: Empirical evidence from French general practitioners about willingness to prescribe international non-proprietary names," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 23-32, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:11:p:1543-1549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.