IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v42y1996i12p1621-1637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, geography and socio-economic status in the diffusion of malignant melanoma risk

Author

Listed:
  • Aase, Asbjørn
  • Bentham, Graham

Abstract

Malignant melanoma is the cancer that has shown the fastest increase in incidence in most white populations in recent decades. This paper studies the diffusion of the disease for males and females, geographical areas and socio-economic groups. Incidence data from the Norwegian Cancer Registry covering the period 1955-1989 make it possible to establish birth cohorts covering a time span from the late 1880s to the late 1950s. For Norway as a whole the increase in incidence was apparent between cohorts born in the 1880s and the 1890s for both sexes. The epidemic was first observable in the most central, south-eastern part of the country, with the onset reaching the most peripheral Northern Norway from the cohort born in the late 1910s. The onset also came later in rural than urban Norway. There are indications that the epidemic started in the more affluent part of the population, followed by an equalization. The increase in melanoma could be a result of more active outdoor recreation from the end of the last century. In cohorts born from the 1930s onwards a slowing down in the increase can be observed. International comparisons show that in most countries the incidence pattern in the first decades of the epidemic was dominated by males; later on the incidence became higher for females. Many cancer registries in the U.S.A. and Oceania now show a downward trend in melanoma incidence for males and females aged 15-29 years. A similar development has not been observed in Europe and Canada up to 1983-1987.

Suggested Citation

  • Aase, Asbjørn & Bentham, Graham, 1996. "Gender, geography and socio-economic status in the diffusion of malignant melanoma risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(12), pages 1621-1637, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:12:p:1621-1637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00318-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:12:p:1621-1637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.