IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v42y1996i11p1545-1553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The at-risk health status and technology: A diagnostic invitation and the 'gift' of knowing

Author

Listed:
  • Kenen, Regina H.

Abstract

In the past two decades, the medical model has extended its jurisdiction to cover a new medical entity--the at-risk health status--which is frequently accompanied by what I call a diagnostic invitation and the 'gift' of knowing. In cases, however, where the diagnosis may only reaffirm the risk but can provide no cure, the value of the 'gift' of knowing is questioned. The at-risk health status also can: (1) develop a symbiotic relationship with diagnostic technology, (2) become an organizing principle in individual and social behavior and (3) provide new tasks for clinical medicine. The perceived cost effectiveness of preventive measures, combined with the desire to use high-technology medicine, to achieve newly expanded definitions of health make it likely that the concept of the at-risk health status will be integrated into whatever health care plan is finally enacted for the United States. In light of the possible negative, as well as positive, effects of at-risk health labelling, American society needs to establish standards for the diagnostic invitation as a gift of knowing especially when the line between prevention and overuse is not always clear.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenen, Regina H., 1996. "The at-risk health status and technology: A diagnostic invitation and the 'gift' of knowing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(11), pages 1545-1553, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:11:p:1545-1553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00248-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christine M. Gunn & Barbara G. Bokhour & Victoria A. Parker & Tracy A. Battaglia & Patricia A. Parker & Angela Fagerlin & Worta McCaskill-Stevens & Hanna Bandos & Sarah B. Blakeslee & Christine Holmbe, 2019. "Understanding Decision Making about Breast Cancer Prevention in Action: The Intersection of Perceived Risk, Perceived Control, and Social Context: NRG Oncology/NSABP DMP-1," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(3), pages 217-227, April.
    2. Caiata-Zufferey, Maria, 2015. "Genetically at-risk status and individual agency. A qualitative study on asymptomatic women living with genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 141-148.
    3. Rotolo, Thomas & Lengefeld, Michael, 2020. "Clearing the cobwebs: An analysis of the timing of youth concussion legislation in U.S. states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk diagnosis technology genetics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:11:p:1545-1553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.