IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v41y1995i7p949-955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homogénéité de la distribution spatiale des cancers du système reproducteur féminin au Québec

Author

Listed:
  • Drapeau, Aline
  • Thouez, Jean-Pierre
  • Ghadirian, Parviz

Abstract

Risk factors associated with women's reproductive life and sexual growth do not adequately predict cancer incidence of the breast, uterus and ovary. The heterogeneous worldwide distribution of these cancers could imply that some environmental and cultural risk factors are involved in their cancerogenesis. The few attempts made so far to unravel their spatial structures at a geographic scale facilitating the search for exogeneous risk factors have proved inconclusive. This study reports the results of a spatial analysis of the cancer incidence rates for breast, cervix, endometrium and ovary among Community Health Departments (CHD) in Quebec using a spatial autocorrelation method. Correlograms built according to four definitions of the inter-CHDs distance indicate that breast and ovary incidence rates follow quite similar spatial gradients attesting to their etiologic affinity. They also suggest that the spatial distribution of endometrial cancer follows a gradient divergent from that of breast and ovary cancers, and that the CHDs'spatial scale does not suitably describe the distribution of cervical cancer. The demonstration of a structured spatial distribution for breast, endometrium and ovary cancers in Québec strengthen the hypothesis that cultural or environmental risk factors are involved in their etiology. But, the observed disparities in the spatial structure of these cancers imply that their etiologic specificity may be greater than their biologic bond would suggest.

Suggested Citation

  • Drapeau, Aline & Thouez, Jean-Pierre & Ghadirian, Parviz, 1995. "Homogénéité de la distribution spatiale des cancers du système reproducteur féminin au Québec," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 949-955, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:7:p:949-955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)00408-L
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:7:p:949-955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.