IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v41y1995i12p1677-1683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnographic studies of ARI in Bolivia and their use by the national ARI programme

Author

Listed:
  • Hudelson, Patricia
  • Huanca, Tomas
  • Charaly, Dolores
  • Cirpa, Virginia

Abstract

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are responsible for one quarter to one third of all deaths in infants and young children, with most deaths being attributed to pneumonia. At present, few measures exist to prevent pneumonia. However, most pneumonia deaths can be averted by treatment with an appropriate antibiotic. The effectiveness of this strategy depends on families' ability to recognize the signs of pneumonia, and to promptly seek care from a trained health practitioner. In order for health workers to communicate effectively with families about how to care for children with ARI, what signs to watch for, and when to come back for care, they need to know how families perceive and respond to respiratory infections. The WHO ARI Programme has recently developed a research protocol for conducting ethnographic studies of community perceptions and practices related to ARI. The purpose of this protocol is describe communities' explanatory models for ARI, identify cultural and other factors that facilitate or constrain appropriate home care and careseeking for children with ARI, and make recommendations to national ARI programmes about how to develop effective communication activities. This paper reports on two studies conducted in Bolivia using the WHO/ARI Focused Ethnographic Study (FES) protocol, and describes the way in which the data were utilized by the national ARI programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Hudelson, Patricia & Huanca, Tomas & Charaly, Dolores & Cirpa, Virginia, 1995. "Ethnographic studies of ARI in Bolivia and their use by the national ARI programme," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(12), pages 1677-1683, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:12:p:1677-1683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00128-T
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:12:p:1677-1683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.