IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i4p557-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role orientation and community pharmacists' participation in a project to improve patient care

Author

Listed:
  • Pendergast, Jane F.
  • Kimberlin, Carole L.
  • Berardo, Donna H.
  • McKenzie, Lynda C.

Abstract

Community pharmacists are being assigned increased responsibility in assuring the appropriateness and effectiveness of drug therapy. This increased responsibility is reflected in recently passed legislation (OBRA '90) in the United States that requires pharmacists to counsel patients about prescriptions received and to engage in prospective drug use review for Medicaid recipients. The potential impact of this legislation is unclear due to a dearth of research evaluating the effects of community pharmacists' activities on medication use. In addition, there is little research on pharmacists' willingness to assume increased responsibility. Research that would demonstrate the effectiveness of community pharmacists in improving therapeutic outcomes is hampered by problems inherent in conducting experimentally designed research in field settings. This paper examines two issues of concern in such studies--namely, the extent to which those who agree to participate in a demonstration project differ from those who decline to participate and the extent to which differential dropout from treatment and control conditions compromise the comparability of the two groups. Specifically, this report examines pharmacist characteristics related to participation in a demonstration project to improve the care of elderly patients. Community pharmacists in Florida who had earlier been asked to participate in a demonstration project (N = 418) were sent mail questionnaires to assess their attitudinal, demographic and employment characteristics. In particular, researchers were interested in the role orientation of pharmacists in regard to patient counseling and physician consultation, satisfaction with current jobs and career choices, employment settings and treatment vs control group assignment as predictors of participation in the research project. Demographic characteristics were also examined as possible predictors of participation. Approximately 86% of those who did participate (N = 102) in the demonstration project and 62% of those who did not participate (N = 316) responded to the questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to model participation (vs non-participation) as a function of pharmacist counselor role orientation, job and career satisfaction, type of pharmacy setting (independent vs chain), group assignment and pharmacist and demographic characteristics. Controlling for all other variables in the model, those pharmacists who were assigned to the control group, had more positive attitudes toward the counseling role of pharmacists and had more positive feelings about their current jobs were more likely to participate in the project. No demographic or employment variables were found to be important. When comparing treatment and control groups among the participants, no differences were found between the two groups on demographic characteristics, pharmacy setting characteristics, counselor role orientation scores, job satisfaction, or confidence in fulfilling expanded patient care roles. Thus there was no indication that drop out from the experimental and control groups after random assignment compromised the comparability of the two groups, at least on the variables examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Pendergast, Jane F. & Kimberlin, Carole L. & Berardo, Donna H. & McKenzie, Lynda C., 1995. "Role orientation and community pharmacists' participation in a project to improve patient care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 557-565, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:557-565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)E0106-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:557-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.