IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i4p479-490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of life of 125 adults surviving 6-18 years after bone marrow transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Bush, Nigel E.
  • Haberman, Mel
  • Donaldson, Gary
  • Sullivan, Keith M.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies examining the medical and psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation have reported most survivors do relatively well while a smaller group continues to experience less than optimal quality of life (QOL). Many of these studies are limited by small sample sizes, limited scope, and focus on a narrow (1-4 year) window of survival. Methods: The descriptive survey examined the QOL, late medical complications, psychological distress, demands of long-term recovery, and health perceptions of 125 adults surviving 6-18 (mean 10) years after marrow transplantation. Seven wide-ranging tests covering 271 items were completed on average in 90 min. Two tests were developed by the authors specifically for assessing QOL in this population. Results: 74% of long-term survivors of bone marrow transplanation reported their current QOL was the same or better than before transplantation, 80% rated their current health status and QOL as good to excellent, and 88% said the benefits of transplantation outweighed the side effects. Ten years or more post-transplantation, long-term survivors continued to experience a moderate incidence of lingering complications and demands, including emotional and sexual dysfunction, fatigue, eye problems, sleep disturbance, general pain and cognitive dysfunction. However, the severity or degree of distress attributed to those complications was, for most survivors, consistently low. Nearly all were back to work or school. Only 5% rated both their QOL and health status as poor. Long-term survivors demonstrated good mood and low psychological distress compared to cancer and population norms, and had the same perceptions as the general population of their current health and expectation of future health. Demands attributed to long-term survival appeared to impose little hardship. The most frequently cited demand of recovery was the perceived lack of social support as time went on. Conclusions: Almost all long-term survivors were leading full and meaningful lives. Persistent complications were, on the whole, dismissed as relatively trivial and the overwhelming majority viewed themselves as cured and well.

Suggested Citation

  • Bush, Nigel E. & Haberman, Mel & Donaldson, Gary & Sullivan, Keith M., 1995. "Quality of life of 125 adults surviving 6-18 years after bone marrow transplantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 479-490, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:479-490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)00153-K
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. JM Ford & DL Kaserman, 2000. "Suicide as an indicator of quality of life: evidence from dialysis patients," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(4), pages 440-448, October.
    2. Schroevers, Maya & Ranchor, Adelita V. & Sanderman, Robbert, 2006. "Adjustment to cancer in the 8 years following diagnosis: A longitudinal study comparing cancer survivors with healthy individuals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 598-610, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:479-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.