IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i2p231-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content and predictors of consultation experiences among finnish primary care patients

Author

Listed:
  • Punamäki, Raija-Leena
  • Kokko, Simo J.

Abstract

The study focuses on how patients' explanations of their illnesses, their own diagnoses and their expectations are related to their experience of general practice consultations. Before seeing the General Practitioner (GP) on call, 127 Finnish acute health centre patients were interviewed about their interpretation of their symptoms, their explanations for the causes of their illnesses and their expectations of the forthcoming consultations. After seeing the GP they were asked to describe what happened in the consultations and to evaluate their experiences. In the qualitative analysis, the following consultation experiences were found: (1) being treated with holistic approach; (2) enjoyment of support and consolation; (3) receipt of important information; (4) subjection to routine and ritualistic conduct; (5) experience of insecurity and helplessness; and (6) experience of indifference and neglect. Loglinear models for predicting the success of medical consultations showed that 'negative medical consultation' is more likely to happen if: (a) the patient's illness explanation integrates both biomedical and psychosocial models; and (b) there is no match between the patient's own and the doctor's disagnosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Punamäki, Raija-Leena & Kokko, Simo J., 1995. "Content and predictors of consultation experiences among finnish primary care patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 231-243, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:2:p:231-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)E0071-Y
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:2:p:231-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.