IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v39y1994i8p1063-1068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions and treatment of intestinal worms in rural Bangladesh: Local differences in knowledge and behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Rousham, E.K.

Abstract

A survey was conducted on 131 mothers in rural Bangladesh to examine knowledge and perceptions of helminth infection in relation to use of health facilities and treatment-seeking behaviour. Almost all respondents considered worms to be a cause of bad health and a high percentage of mothers had obtained deworming treatment for their children. However, marked differences were found in mothers' descriptions of the causes and prevention of helminth infection in two adjacent areas; Pullakandi and Shekpara. The discrepancies in biomedical knowledge corresponded with differences in treatment-seeking behaviour in the two areas. All households in the area had access to free deworming treatment provided by a health clinic, but this facility was predominantly used by women living nearby in Pullakandi. Because of the cultural and social constraints on female activities, women living further from the clinic, in Shekpara, preferred to send their husbands to a pharmacy in the nearby town to buy deworming treatment. As a consequence, these households were at a relative disadvantage in respect of the low exposure of women to health education and the greater financial cost of deworming treatment. The study highlights the influences of social and cultural factors on treatment-seeking behaviour, which in turn affect women's exposure to health education and biomedical knowledge of helminths. Further questions are raised, however, on the ability of women to implement preventive measures and the impact of health education on rates of parasitic infection.

Suggested Citation

  • Rousham, E.K., 1994. "Perceptions and treatment of intestinal worms in rural Bangladesh: Local differences in knowledge and behaviour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1063-1068, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:8:p:1063-1068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90377-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:8:p:1063-1068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.