IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i4p531-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing self-diagnosis and treatment of perceived helminthic infection in a rural Guatemalan community

Author

Listed:
  • Booth, S.
  • Johns, T.
  • Lopez-Palacios, C.Y.

Abstract

Changes in the diagnosis and treatment of helminthic infection were examined during a longitudinal study in a rural community in Guatemala. Self-diagnosis was predominant, with an increase in perceived helminthic infection during an economic crisis within the community. Allium sativum L. and Chenopodium ambrosoides L. were used as anthelmintics, often in conjunction with commercial drugs. During the economic crisis the use of plants as treatment for perceived infection increased whereas use of commercial helminthic medicine decreased. Dietary modifications were observed during periods of perceived infection, but were not consistent in the food items modified or the nature of the modification. Within the community individuals exhibited considerable heterogenity in their approaches to treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Booth, S. & Johns, T. & Lopez-Palacios, C.Y., 1993. "Factors influencing self-diagnosis and treatment of perceived helminthic infection in a rural Guatemalan community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 531-539, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:4:p:531-539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90288-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:4:p:531-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.