IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i1p53-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the uptake of health checks in general practice: Invitation methods and patients' health beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Norman, Paul

Abstract

General practice is in an ideal position to encourage people to adopt healthier lifestyles. One way in which this might be achieved is through the offering of health checks. This paper sought to identify some of the factors which may be important in predicting the uptake of health checks. These were seen to fall into two broad areas--the way in which patients are invited and patients' health beliefs. For the purposes of the study, 299 middle-aged male patients registered at a single practice were randomly allocated to be invited to a health check via two invitation methods. In the first, patients were sent an invitation letter with an appointment. In the second patients' notes were tagged so that they could be invited opportunistically by their GP. After one year, 63.5% of patients invited opportunistically had attended a health check compared with 61.2% of patients sent an invitation letter. However, only 51.6% of the opportunistic group had been invited after one year, meaning that the letter invitation method produced twice as many patients at the health check over the same period of time. Examination of health belief questionnaires sent to patients prior to the commencement of the health checks (50.2% response rate) indicated that attenders had a stronger initial intention to attend and placed a greater value on their health. More detailed analysis revealed intention to show strong relationships with beliefs about the benefits of, and barriers to, attendance at a health check. These results suggest that in order to increase uptake of health checks letter invitations need to be employed. Such letters should emphasize the benefits of health checks and address the potential barriers to attendance.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman, Paul, 1993. "Predicting the uptake of health checks in general practice: Invitation methods and patients' health beliefs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 53-59, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:1:p:53-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90317-W
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ai Theng Cheong & Karuthan Chinna & Ee Ming Khoo & Su May Liew, 2017. "Determinants for cardiovascular disease health check questionnaire: A validation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Ai Theng Cheong & Ee Ming Khoo & Su May Liew & Karuthan Chinna, 2018. "What are the determinants for individuals to undergo cardiovascular disease health checks? A cross sectional survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:1:p:53-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.