IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v36y1993i5p683-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing nurses' and patients' pain evaluations: A study of hospitalized patients in Kuwait

Author

Listed:
  • Harrison, Ann

Abstract

All eligible patients hospitalized on the general medical, surgical and pediatric wards of a distinct hospital in Kuwait during the first 2 weeks of April 1990 (N = 199) were interviewed about their pain and the medical care provided. Patients rated their current pain using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) on which 0 was labelled 'no pain' and 10 'unberable pain', and also the least and worst levels of pain which they had experienced during the previous 24 hr. Pediatric patients rated their mood at these times using a cartoon faces scale ([1]: McGrath P.A., DeVeber L.L. and Hearn M.T. advances in Pain Research and Therapy, pp. 387-393. Raven Press, New York, 1985). Patients were asked to describe the most painful procedure which they had experienced whilst hospitalized, to detail their reactions to any uncontrolled pain, and recount the outcome of any requests made for additional analgesics. Whichever nurse on duty had had prime responsibility for caring for the patient was asked to furnish comparable VAS ratings of the patient's pain, and to categorize the patient as providing an accurate picture of, exaggerating, or understanding his/her pain. Overall, nurses returned significantly lower estimates than their patients. Pediatric patients and patients described by their nurses as 'understating their pain', however, were exceptions. The vast majority of patients approved of the medical care provided and the pain management, and considered that nurses are well able to judge patients' pain and what pain patients experience. And yet the VAS reports from patients indicated that uncontrolled pain was common. Also, when specifically questioned, a substantial proportion of patients stated that pain had had a negative impact on thier mood and activity. Various explanations for these findings are discussed, and their implications for effective pain management. Some of the special problems facing nurses in Kuwait are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Harrison, Ann, 1993. "Comparing nurses' and patients' pain evaluations: A study of hospitalized patients in Kuwait," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 683-692, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:5:p:683-692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90065-C
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:5:p:683-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.