Author
Listed:
- Kunzel, Carol
- Sadowsky, Donald
Abstract
This study posed two questions: what is the level of perceived occupational risk among American general practice dentists (GPDs)? What factors influence perception of occupational risk for HIV infection among GPDs? In data obtained from a national mail survey of 1351 GPDs (response rate, 88%) 31% of American GPDs expressed disagreement with the statement that HIV + individuals can be safely treated in their office settings. Of the 16 variables entered into a multiple regression equation, 9 variables had a statistically significant influence on dentists' assessment of occupational risk. In order of their influence they were (1) concern re the economic viability of the practice, (2) ethical obligation to treat patients at risk, (3) certainty of having treated patients with HIV infection, (4) risk attributed to four accidental occupational exposures, (5) concern re treatment of homosexuals, (6) relevant continuing education exposure, (7) personal worry re transmission of HIV infection from patients, (8) implementation of infection control behaviors, (9) number of patients seen per week. Statistically nonsignificant predictors of interest included age, knowledge level re HIV transmission routes, practice location in a high prevalence area, and perceived effectiveness of infection control behaviors. Results argue for intervention programs with less focus on delivery of factual information regarding the transmission of the disease and the effectiveness of infection control techniques, and more emphasis on the themes of practice economic viability, professional ethics, and structured educational encounters involving dentists' knowing exposure to HIV-infected patients.
Suggested Citation
Kunzel, Carol & Sadowsky, Donald, 1993.
"Predicting dentists' perceived occupational risk for HIV infection,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 1579-1586, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:12:p:1579-1586
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:12:p:1579-1586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.