IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v35y1992i10p1283-1292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social inequities in cardiovascular disease risk factors in East and West Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Helmert, Uwe
  • Mielck, Andreas
  • Classen, Elvira

Abstract

Social class related differences in prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Germany were investigated with special emphasis on comparisons between East and West Germany and on time trends. Databases for West Germany are the first and second National Health Survey (survey 1: N=4794, survey 2: N=5315), carried out in the framework of the German Cardiovascular Prevention Study, and for East Germany the first GDR-MONICA project (N=6125). Different social class indices were applied to evaluate social inequities for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking, obesity and predicted cardiovascular disease mortality. As a main result, it was found that very similar patterns in the relation between social class characteristics and cardiovascular disease risk factor prevalence occurred for both parts of Germany. Social class gradients were strongest for obesity and weakest for hypercholesterolemia. Analysis of time trends for the period from 1984 to 1988 (for West Germany only) revealed an increase in social inequalities for hypertension in males and cigarette smoking in females. These findings point to the need to focus more on social disadvantages segments in the population when community based health promotion and disease prevention programs are brought into action.

Suggested Citation

  • Helmert, Uwe & Mielck, Andreas & Classen, Elvira, 1992. "Social inequities in cardiovascular disease risk factors in East and West Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1283-1292, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:10:p:1283-1292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90181-O
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:10:p:1283-1292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.