IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v344y2024ics0277953624000972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reality check. The issue of social plausibility in Virtual reality therapy with addiction patients

Author

Listed:
  • Borelle, Céline
  • Forner, Elsa

Abstract

In France, virtual reality has been experimented since 2016 to address addictive behaviors. The existing literature insists on the “immersive” dimension of the technology as a significant factor in the efficacy of exposure. An ethnographic approach, however, suggests that the realism criterion should be reassessed. Based on a fieldwork conducted in the addictology department of a French hospital that made use of Virtual reality therapy (VRT), the article shows that it is a form of technical reiteration designed to develop reflexivity about one's actions, provoking the craving so that it can be domesticated. The patient's engagement in “as if” mode is facilitated by the therapist's work in mapping the patient's addictive practices, personalizing the exposure situations, and elaborating the simulation as being part of a practical experiment. While the question of graphic realism does not seem especially problematic, the question of social plausibility can put the simulation operation under strain.

Suggested Citation

  • Borelle, Céline & Forner, Elsa, 2024. "Reality check. The issue of social plausibility in Virtual reality therapy with addiction patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000972
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624000972
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.