IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v344y2024ics0277953624000935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘diagnostic gap’ and ‘economic burden’ of depression: Global mental health in neoliberal Poland (2010s–2020s)

Author

Listed:
  • Szulęcka, Beata

Abstract

While critical sociologists and anthropologists of health have questioned Global Mental Health policies as postcolonial, developmental agendas, little is known on how this critique applies within the central and eastern European countries. As this article shows with the case of Poland, since the advent of capitalism and liberal democracy, the psychiatric conceptualization of depression has steadily aligned with global mental health (GMH) frameworks, amplifying pre-existing trends towards biomedical dominance in Polish psychiatry and the economic framing of mental health in policy-making. These trends are evidenced by the study of Polish Psychiatry, an official journal issued by Polish Psychiatric Association and health policy documents published since the 2010s, including statements by the Ministry of Health. Two findings are presented: first, the logic of ‘closing the gap’ between Poland and the West has shaped how depression prevalence data is produced and interpreted by state medical institutions and in expert psychiatric discourse; second, the reconceptualization of mental illness through its supposed economic cost has become a dominant approach to depression in Polish psychiatry and public health. Thus, in showing how the Global Mental Health agenda has permeated the specific context of Poland, promoting more individual and biomedical conceptions of mental illness, this case study enables advancing the postcolonial critique of mental health.

Suggested Citation

  • Szulęcka, Beata, 2024. "The ‘diagnostic gap’ and ‘economic burden’ of depression: Global mental health in neoliberal Poland (2010s–2020s)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000935
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624000935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.