IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v344y2024ics0277953624000686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does digital infrastructure improve public Health? A quasi-natural experiment based on China's Broadband policy

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yiwei
  • Liu, Keshan
  • Zhang, XiangLin
  • Guo, Qiuyue

Abstract

This study proposed a scheme for improving people's health from the perspective of digital infrastructure construction. We used the China Family Panel Studies conducted between 2010 and 2020 and the digital infrastructure construction marked by the Broadband China policy between 2014 and 2016 as a quasi-natural experiment. We adopted the multi-time difference-in-differences method to identify the causal relationship between digital infrastructure and people's health. We found that digital infrastructure construction significantly improved people's health, and the effect was more prominent among young and middle-aged residents and those with less than a university education. Moreover, digital infrastructure construction improved the utilization of medical services, helped residents develop healthy lifestyles, and increased people's health investments. Additionally, digital infrastructure reduced health inequality among people and promoted health equity. The findings could guide future policies to improve people's health and well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yiwei & Liu, Keshan & Zhang, XiangLin & Guo, Qiuyue, 2024. "Does digital infrastructure improve public Health? A quasi-natural experiment based on China's Broadband policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000686
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624000686
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.