IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v344y2024ics0277953624000637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When patients demur: Resisting diagnostic closure in US primary care

Author

Listed:
  • McArthur, Amanda

Abstract

Patients are more engaged in their healthcare than ever before, including in the process of diagnostic sensemaking. But in acute primary care encounters, the interactional flow of the visit is shaped by an orientation toward the physician as the authority over diagnostic reasoning. Once physicians close diagnostic inquiry and transition into counseling, their assessment – and the extent to which it converges with the patient's perspective – comes into full view. Yet this is precisely when patients have reduced occasions to speak up if they do have concerns, as the “train has left the station” both diagnostically and interactionally. Using conversation analysis and a dataset of 75 video recordings of acute primary care encounters in the US, this article examines how patients speak up in this constrained environment.

Suggested Citation

  • McArthur, Amanda, 2024. "When patients demur: Resisting diagnostic closure in US primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000637
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624000637
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.