IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v342y2024ics0277953624000030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Less stunted? The impact of Chinese health aid on child nutrition

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jia

Abstract

Despite the increasing recognition of China's role as a global health donor, particularly in Africa, few studies have explored its effectiveness. We geographically matched project-level aid data from AidData with household survey data from Demographic and Health Surveys across eight African countries to examine the effect of Chinese health aid on the nutritional status of children in recipient countries. In addition to adopting a spatiotemporal identification strategy, we also included mother fixed-effects to examine variations among siblings who were exposed to Chinese health aid projects at different times. The empirical results consistently indicated that children living adjacent to Chinese health aid projects had a better nutritional status. The treatment effect of Chinese health aid projects is heterogeneous across household characteristics, types, and sectors of aid projects. Finally, vaccination may serve as a mechanism linking Chinese health aid and child nutrition in the treatment areas of recipient countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jia, 2024. "Less stunted? The impact of Chinese health aid on child nutrition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:342:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000030
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624000030
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:342:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.