IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v340y2024ics0277953623008286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond burnout: Moral suffering among healthcare workers in the first COVID-19 surge

Author

Listed:
  • Sherman, Melina
  • Klinenberg, Eric

Abstract

The U.S. is facing a national shortage of healthcare workers, as waves of clinicians quit their jobs or leave the profession entirely. Much of the public discourse around this exodus characterizes it as the result of widespread “burnout.” This study draws on in-depth interviews with 22 healthcare workers in New York City to gain deeper understanding of what is leading them to abandon their roles despite the abundant need for their services. It finds that “burnout” in healthcare may be largely explained by moral distress and moral injury inflicted on healthcare workers struggling to care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. After presenting a review of the recent literature on moral injury and moral distress, this study lays out five kinds of experiences that emerged during the interviews as the most salient contributors to moral distress, on the one hand, and moral injury, on the other, among healthcare workers. Taken together, these experiences are referred to as “moral suffering.” The key finding from this research is that moral suffering, even when undiagnosed and unnamed, affects HCWs’ ability to provide care and influences their decisions to leave the healthcare profession. Ultimately, this article suggests a need to rethink the ways in which moral distress and moral injury are applied in social scientific research and concludes by indicating how future research can promote the transformation of networks of injury in healthcare into networks of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherman, Melina & Klinenberg, Eric, 2024. "Beyond burnout: Moral suffering among healthcare workers in the first COVID-19 surge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:340:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623008286
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:340:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.