IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v340y2024ics0277953623008006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic disparities in mammography screening in the United States from 2012 to 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Ando, Mariko
  • Yazawa, Aki
  • Kawachi, Ichiro

Abstract

The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socioeconomic disparities in mammography uptake remain poorly understood. We used repeated cross-sectional data from the 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 waves of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, focusing on the U.S. women aged 50–74 years and investigated the relationships of educational attainment, employment status, and household income with a missed mammogram in the past two years. We ran Poisson regression analyses accounting for survey weights. The sample numbers were 139,761 in 2012, 137,916 in 2014, 140,000 in 2016, 116,756 in 2018, and 102,774 in 2020, respectively. Women with the lower educational attainment and lower household incomes reported higher proportions of missed mammography screening. Self-employed women were most likely to miss a mammogram. Accounting for other covariates, there was an increase in the adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) of missed mammography from 2018 to 2020 (pre-pandemic versus post pandemic onset) for self-employed women compared to women in waged work. Non-Hispanic Black women who were self-employed (PR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51) and employed for wages (PR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.73) were at lower risks of missing a mammogram compared to non-Hispanic White women in the same categories. The findings suggest that disparities for mammography uptake widened after the pandemic onset, especially for employment status, which varied by race/ethnicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ando, Mariko & Yazawa, Aki & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2024. "Socioeconomic disparities in mammography screening in the United States from 2012 to 2020," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:340:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008006
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623008006
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:340:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.