IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i8p875-885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguous responsibility in the doctor-patient relationship: The case of infertility

Author

Listed:
  • Becker, Gay
  • Nachtigall, Robert D.

Abstract

The effects of ambiguous responsibility in the doctor-patient relationship on persons under-going medical treatment for infertility are examined through the negotiation process that ensues following diagnosis. Through the analysis of 79 interviews with women and men undergoing infertility treatment, it was found that: (1) diagnosis reinforced individuals' sense of responsibility for their infertility; (2) ambiguity in the doctor-patient relationship affected shifts in patients' perception of physician responsibility, and (3) patients eventually re-established responsibility for their medical treatment. The implications of ambiguous responsibility for symbolic meanings in biomedicine and the way those meanings are linked to power and authority are explored through an examination of power in patient and physician roles, clinical uncertainty, and medical competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Becker, Gay & Nachtigall, Robert D., 1991. "Ambiguous responsibility in the doctor-patient relationship: The case of infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 875-885, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:8:p:875-885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90243-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:8:p:875-885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.