IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i4p507-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The informal sector of welfare: A crisis in caring?

Author

Listed:
  • Graham, Hilary

Abstract

The informal sector is the major provider of informal care for dependent people and everyday care for able-bodied people in Britain. A large and complex sector of care, it has come to occupy a central place in British government policies for health and welfare. Through the 1980s, the informal sector was increasingly identified as a solution to problems in the formal systems of care. The paper reviews the concept of informal care and the welfare philosophies which informed the development of these policies, arguing for a broader and more critical perspective which locates informal care within the context of the wider caring work that goes on in households. Seen in this context, structural features of caring that are celebrated as strengths (its base in kinship relations where carers are unpaid, for example), can be experienced as problematic by those involved in caring. As a case study, the paper focuses on the experiences of mothers caring for children on low incomes for insights into some of the contradictions of caring.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham, Hilary, 1991. "The informal sector of welfare: A crisis in caring?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 507-515, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:4:p:507-515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90354-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivo Bischoff & Nataliya Kusa, 2016. "Citizens‘ preferences for a tax exemption for caregiving heirs – an empirical analysis," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201621, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    2. Irene Hardill & Susan Baines, 2003. "Doing One's Duty? Voluntary Work and the ‘New Economy’," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 18(2), pages 102-108, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:4:p:507-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.