IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i1p103-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epidemiology and the new public health; Implications for training

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce, N. G.

Abstract

It is currently believed that epidemiology should play a much greater part in the research and practice of public health medicine. Although epidemiology has much to offer in this field, the nature of the scientific method is often in conflict with the pragmatic and incremental responses of public health medicine, particularly at the district level. This should not prevent the development of collaborative work in public health practice, but it does require some re-orientation of attitudes, and there are implications for training. It is suggested that the training of public health epidemiologists should be based in academic departments and have two major components, (a) an ongoing programme of scientific study in the academic environment, and (b) involvement in a range of collaborative service projects which will also provide general experience of public health medicine. This arrangement should help to maintain the scientific skills and judgement of the public health epidemiologist when faced with the need to modify traditional methods of investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce, N. G., 1991. "Epidemiology and the new public health; Implications for training," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 103-106, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:1:p:103-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90134-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:1:p:103-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.