IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v31y1990i4p421-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Questioning the status quo: Sickness absence research so far claims more than it should!

Author

Listed:
  • Reidy, Angela

Abstract

This article is in the nature of a cautionary tale for those working alongside any group of medics who are required to collect epidemiological data, or plan based upon data collected by medical experts without having access to that data. The field of work is occupational health and the specialised area is the relationship between socio-economic variables and absence from work due to sickness. The over-riding criticism of the sickness absence literature to datr is that the use of analytical statistics is poor or in most cases almost non-existent and that there is very little understanding of the epidemiological concepts of 'confounding' and 'effect modification'. An example is given of one particular statistical procedure, multi-variate hierarchical log-linear modelling, which if used by future researchers could prevent the recurrence of some of the previous problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Reidy, Angela, 1990. "Questioning the status quo: Sickness absence research so far claims more than it should!," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 421-432, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:4:p:421-432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90037-S
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:4:p:421-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.