IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v314y2022ics0277953622007833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into effects of individual, dyadic, and collaborative planning interventions on automatic, conscious, and social process variables

Author

Listed:
  • Kulis, Ewa
  • Szczuka, Zofia
  • Banik, Anna
  • Siwa, Maria
  • Boberska, Monika
  • Knoll, Nina
  • Radtke, Theda
  • Scholz, Urte
  • Rhodes, Ryan E.
  • Luszczynska, Aleksandra

Abstract

Objective: Going beyond the effects of individual planning (“I-for-me”), we investigate the associations of dyadic (“we-for-me”) and collaborative (“we-for-us”) planning with automatic, conscious, and social process variables that may elucidate the differences through which these three types of planning operate. We tested the effects of three planning interventions on: (1) habit strength, representing an automatic process, (2) the use of individual planning, representing a conscious process, (3) the use of collaborative planning, representing conscious and social processes, and (4) collaborative social control, representing a social process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kulis, Ewa & Szczuka, Zofia & Banik, Anna & Siwa, Maria & Boberska, Monika & Knoll, Nina & Radtke, Theda & Scholz, Urte & Rhodes, Ryan E. & Luszczynska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Insights into effects of individual, dyadic, and collaborative planning interventions on automatic, conscious, and social process variables," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:314:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622007833
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622007833
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szczuka, Zofia & Kulis, Ewa & Boberska, Monika & Banik, Anna & Kruk, Magdalena & Keller, Jan & Knoll, Nina & Scholz, Urte & Abraham, Charles & Luszczynska, Aleksandra, 2021. "Can individual, dyadic, or collaborative planning reduce sedentary behavior? A randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Burkert, Silke & Scholz, Urte & Gralla, Oliver & Roigas, Jan & Knoll, Nina, 2011. "Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 783-792, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szczuka, Zofia & Kulis, Ewa & Boberska, Monika & Banik, Anna & Kruk, Magdalena & Keller, Jan & Knoll, Nina & Scholz, Urte & Abraham, Charles & Luszczynska, Aleksandra, 2021. "Can individual, dyadic, or collaborative planning reduce sedentary behavior? A randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Keller, Jan & Fleig, Lena & Hohl, Diana Hilda & Wiedemann, Amelie U. & Burkert, Silke & Luszczynska, Aleksandra & Knoll, Nina, 2017. "Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 53-62.
    3. Giulia Villa & Emanuele Galli & Vittoria Azzimonti & Marianna Doneda & Noemi Giannetta & Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, 2022. "Empowerment-Based Education in Urological Patients: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 666-689, May.
    4. Berli, Corina & Stadler, Gertraud & Inauen, Jennifer & Scholz, Urte, 2016. "Action control in dyads: A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity in everyday life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 89-97.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:314:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622007833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.