IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i3p341-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in the approaches of the doctor, manager, politician and social scientist in health care controversies--Hospital case-mix management methods: An illustration of the manager's approach in health care controversies

Author

Listed:
  • de Pouvourville, Gérard

Abstract

Resource allocation methods in health care are one of the major sources of controversies between managers, doctors, politicians and social scientists. In the past 10 years, an important innovation has appeared in hospital management and payment methods: case based systems, the most well known being the Diagnostic Related Group (DRG), that have been used for 5 years by Medicare in the U.S.A. to pay for hospital care. Through the analysis of the diffusion of DRGs in the U.S.A. and in France, we support the idea that DRGs are a typical illustration of the managerial approach to health care. They represent a significant breach in professional autonomy through the introduction of bureaucratic rationality. We also show how scientific controversies are structured by the dynamics of the diffusion of case based management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • de Pouvourville, Gérard, 1989. "Differences in the approaches of the doctor, manager, politician and social scientist in health care controversies--Hospital case-mix management methods: An illustration of the manager's approach in h," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 341-349, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:3:p:341-349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90282-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:3:p:341-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.