IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i2p225-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits of self-help groups: A survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups

Author

Listed:
  • Trojan, Alf

Abstract

This paper gives a report on the benefits of self-help groups as depicted by 232 members from 65 different disease-related groups. Intensive interviews and participant observation enabled us to formulate a questionnaire with 125 mostly standardized questions. The questions referred mainly to motives for membership, working procedures within the groups, goals and effectiveness, outcome of participation and need for outside support. The focus of this paper will be on what the members reported about the changes and effects induced by their participation in self-help groups. The interviewed group members reported a wide variety of goals. These were classified into two categories according to their range. Goals directed towards the group or group members were achieved (at least partly) by more than 90%. Goals directed towards persons outside the group (e.g. to change opinions of the family or of the professional system) were mentioned by about two thirds of the interviewed members. About three quarters of them achieved these goals at least partly. The effects of participation were grouped into the following categories. 1--Impact on disease-related stress (positive health effects, general enlargement of competence, general social activation); 2--impact on the relationship with family and friends (relationship with partner, changes in personal network); 3--impact on patient behaviour and professional services (general enlargement of competence in relation to the professional care system, social activation in relation to the professional care system, utilization of professional services). Most of the members reported considerable positive changes in these dimensions. Negative impacts were mentioned by a very small minority (between 1 and 4%). The state of research on the benefits of self-help groups is still rather unsatisfactory. There is, however, enough evidence to draw two conclusions concerning policy: 1--Self- help groups cannot replace professional services. 2--Self-help groups should get public support because they have an important function for people suffering from chronic diseases or other problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Trojan, Alf, 1989. "Benefits of self-help groups: A survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 225-232, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:2:p:225-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90171-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:2:p:225-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.