IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i2p99-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional uncertainty and physician medical decision-making in a multiple treatment framework

Author

Listed:
  • Wolff, Nancy

Abstract

This paper develops a new microanalytic approach to physician medical decision-making treatment setting. Physician medical decision-making is modelled as a two-stage sequential process. In Stage 1, the patient's illness is diagnosed and the health outcomes for all illness-related restoration options are identified. In Stage 2, an "optimal" restoration option is selected. This model provides new insights into physician medical decision-making and the complexity of proving physician-induced demand in a medical care market where professional uncertainty and consumer heterogeneity exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolff, Nancy, 1989. "Professional uncertainty and physician medical decision-making in a multiple treatment framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 99-107, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:2:p:99-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90136-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denzil G. Fiebig & Rosalie Viney & Stephanie Knox & Marion Haas & Deborah J. Street & Arne R. Hole & Edith Weisberg & Deborah Bateson, 2017. "Consideration Sets and Their Role in Modelling Doctor Recommendations About Contraceptives," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 54-73, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:2:p:99-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.