IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i12p1283-1288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piecework, repetitive work and medicine use in the clothing industry

Author

Listed:
  • Vinet, Alain
  • Vézina, Michel
  • Brisson, Chantal
  • Bernard, Paul-Marie

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the potential effects of severe time constraints on workers' health. Medicine use is considered to be an indicator of non-specific morbidity that is worthy of interest in industrial health research when it is possible to compare workers who share the same culture and socio-economic characteristics, but are submitted to different work conditions. In the clothing industry, our hypotheses were that (1) piecework paid operators would have a higher percentage of medicine users than the hourly paid and (2) operators who did repetitive work would have a higher percentage of medicine users than those who did non-repetitive work. Women selected into the study were between the ages of 45 and 70, natives of Canada, spoke French and lived in the metropolitan region of Montreal. The occupational data came from the files of The Ladies' Clothing Joint Commission. They encompass the 30-years period 85-1956. Data on socio-economic characteristics, smoking status and medicine use of the 800 respondents were obtained by questionnaires administered by specially trained nurses. Among currently employed women, the probability of using stomach medication was higher for pieceworkers than among women who received an hourly wage: OR = 2.57 (1.19-3.96). The probability was also higher for women who did repetitive work than for women who did non-repetitive work: OR = 2.43 (1.26-3.60).

Suggested Citation

  • Vinet, Alain & Vézina, Michel & Brisson, Chantal & Bernard, Paul-Marie, 1989. "Piecework, repetitive work and medicine use in the clothing industry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1283-1288, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:12:p:1283-1288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90347-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:12:p:1283-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.