IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i12p1249-1253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, attitudes and practices among rural communities in Zimbabwe in relation to Phytolacca dodecandra--a plant molluscicide

Author

Listed:
  • Ndamba, J.
  • Chandiwana, S.K.
  • Makaza, N.

Abstract

Questionnaires about schistosomiasis and Phytolacca dodecandra, a plant molluscicide with potential to control schistosomiasis transmitting snails, were administered to 271 women and 168 men in two communal areas where the plant grows naturally, and in a further two areas where no records of the plant exist. 78.9% of the respondents thought that schistosomiasis was a dangerous disease with blood in urine being the most recognised symptom. 11.8% said that snails were involved in the transmission of the disease, although their role in sustaining the life cycle of the schistosome parasite was not understood. Knowledge about P. dodecandra was restricted to people resident in areas where the plant grows naturally and to immigrants from areas where it is known to grow. The most common use of the plant was as a floor polish. Knowledge of uses of the plant were found to be related to the sex of the respondents. Seventy-seven percent of the people interviewed were prepared to cultivate the plant for self-help schistosomiasis control programmes. Of the 23% that were not willing to cultivate P. dodecandra, 47.7% cited scarcity of land as the main obstacle. Other reasons were lack of knowledge about the plant (21%), lack of confidence in the success of such self-help programmes (11.2%) and indifference due to old age (20%).

Suggested Citation

  • Ndamba, J. & Chandiwana, S.K. & Makaza, N., 1989. "Knowledge, attitudes and practices among rural communities in Zimbabwe in relation to Phytolacca dodecandra--a plant molluscicide," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1249-1253, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:12:p:1249-1253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90343-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:12:p:1249-1253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.