IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v282y2021ics0277953621004706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variation in self-identified most stressful life event by outcome of previous pregnancy in a population-based sample interviewed 6–36 months following delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Stanhope, Kaitlyn K.
  • Temple, Jeff R.
  • Bann, Carla
  • Parker, Corette B.
  • Dudley, Donald
  • Hogue, Carol J.R.

Abstract

The majority of health research uses a deductive approach to measure stressful life events, despite evidence that perception of what is stressful varies. The goal of this project was to 1) describe the distribution of self-identified most stressful life events in a cohort of women who experienced a perinatal loss (stillbirth or neonatal death) or live birth in the previous three years and 2) test how childhood adversity influences participant selection of their most stressful life event. We used data from 987 women (282 with stillbirth, 657 without loss, and 48 with a neonatal death in the first 28 days) in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network – OASIS (Outcomes after Study Index Stillbirth) follow-up study, a population-based sample set in five U.S. states in 2009. We applied an inductive coding process to open-ended responses to a question about the most stressful event or major crisis that participants had ever experienced, resulting in a set of 15 categories. We compare psychologic wellbeing across self-identified most stressful life event, accounting for sampling and loss-to-follow-up weights. Overall, stillbirth was most commonly identified as the most stressful event (18.3% [95% CI: 15.6, 21.5]), followed by loss by death of someone other than a child (17.25% [95% CI: 13.9, 20.3]). For participants who experienced a perinatal loss, we fit multivariable logistic regression models to quantify the association between report of childhood maltreatment and identifying the perinatal loss as the most stressful life event, calculating risk ratios (RRs). Reporting any moderate or severe childhood maltreatment was associated with 24% lower risk of identifying the perinatal loss as the most stressful life event (adjusted RR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.58, 1.01]), after adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and education. These results demonstrate the value of combining standardized measures with open-ended, inductive approaches to measuring stress in large, population-based studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanhope, Kaitlyn K. & Temple, Jeff R. & Bann, Carla & Parker, Corette B. & Dudley, Donald & Hogue, Carol J.R., 2021. "Variation in self-identified most stressful life event by outcome of previous pregnancy in a population-based sample interviewed 6–36 months following delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:282:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621004706
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621004706
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:282:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621004706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.