IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v270y2021ics0277953621000149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neighborhood atmosphere modifies the eudaimonic impact of cohesion and friendship among older adults: A multilevel mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Gan, Daniel R.Y.
  • Fung, John Chye
  • Cho, Im Sik

Abstract

A growing body of research on community gerontology suggests that interventions in the neighborhood may promote older adults' wellbeing. Drawing on Costello's community (2014) and phenomenology of atmosphere, we examine contextual moderators of the relationship between neighborhood quality and older adults' mental wellbeing in high-density urban areas. We used mixed methods. Quantitative data were collected from 601 community-dwelling adults over age fifty, using a comprehensive measure of neighborhood perception, which includes neighborhood cohesion, friendship and the physical environment. Positive aspects of participants' mental health were also measured. Regression analysis was conducted. Based on quantitative data, four types of neighborhoods were identified. Interviews and focus groups were conducted to understand their differences using comparative thematic analysis. Better neighborhood experience improves older adults' mental health. This association persists after controlling for a range of covariates including depressive symptoms. At the neighborhood level, neighborhoods of higher quality have significantly better aggregated mental health scores after controlling for depressive symptoms. Three themes were identified from qualitative data, namely sense of self, sense of community, and neighborhood atmosphere. Poor neighborhood atmosphere limited the extent to which the neighborhood improves the mental health of older adults. In neighborhoods where positive neighborly interactions prevailed over individual adversities, older adults exhibited better mental health. Neighborhood atmosphere is an important contextual factor which structures how older adults may benefit from spending time in the neighborhood. Enhancing a sense of community in the neighborhood could improve older adults' mental health. Age-friendly interventions in urban contexts should examine neighborhood atmosphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Gan, Daniel R.Y. & Fung, John Chye & Cho, Im Sik, 2021. "Neighborhood atmosphere modifies the eudaimonic impact of cohesion and friendship among older adults: A multilevel mixed-methods study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:270:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621000149
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621000149
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harpa Stefansdottir, 2018. "The role of urban atmosphere for non-work activity locations," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 319-335, May.
    2. Elizabeth A. Markle & Rachel Rodgers & William Sanchez & Mary Ballou, 2015. "Social support in the cohousing model of community: a mixed-methods analysis," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 616-631, December.
    3. Young, Anne F. & Russell, Anne & Powers, Jennifer R., 2004. "The sense of belonging to a neighbourhood: can it be measured and is it related to health and well being in older women?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 2627-2637, December.
    4. J. D. Carpentieri & Jane Elliott & Caroline E. Brett & Ian J. Deary, 2017. "Adapting to Aging: Older People Talk About Their Use of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation to Maximize Well-being in the Context of Physical Decline," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 351-361.
    5. Elliott, Jane & Gale, Catharine R. & Parsons, Samantha & Kuh, Diana, 2014. "Neighbourhood cohesion and mental wellbeing among older adults: A mixed methods approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 44-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ng, Ted Kheng Siang & Gan, Daniel R.Y. & Mahendran, Rathi & Kua, Ee Heok & Ho, Roger C-M, 2021. "Social connectedness as a mediator for horticultural therapy's biological effect on community-dwelling older adults: Secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rossana Gomez-Campos & Ruben Vidal-Espinoza & Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de Campos & Cynthia Lee-Andruske & Jose Sulla-Torres & Carolina Cornejo-Valderrama & Nancy Lepe-Martinez & Juan Lagos-Luciano, 2021. "Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Carolina Mayen Huerta & Ariane Utomo, 2022. "Barriers Affecting Women’s Access to Urban Green Spaces during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Tong Zou & Yikun Su & Yaowu Wang, 2018. "Examining Relationships between Social Capital, Emotion Experience and Life Satisfaction for Sustainable Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Jie Tang & Nanqian Chen & Hailun Liang & Xu Gao, 2022. "The Effect of Built Environment on Physical Health and Mental Health of Adults: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2023. "Person–Environment Fit in Urban Neighbourhoods in Slovenia: Challenges and Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Orçun Muhammet Şimşek & Orhan Koçak & Mustafa Z. Younis, 2021. "The Impact of Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions on Satisfaction with Life and the Mediating Role of Loneliness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Jim Hudson & Kath Scanlon & Chihiro Udagawa & Melissa Fernández Arrigoitia & Mara Ferreri & Karen West, 2021. "‘A Slow Build-Up of a History of Kindness’: Exploring the Potential of Community-Led Housing in Alleviating Loneliness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Engel, L. & Chudyk, A.M. & Ashe, M.C. & McKay, H.A. & Whitehurst, D.G.T. & Bryan, S., 2016. "Older adults' quality of life – Exploring the role of the built environment and social cohesion in community-dwelling seniors on low income," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Ka Shing Cheung & Chung Yim Yiu, 2022. "The economics of architectural aesthetics: Identifying price effect of urban ambiences by different house cohorts," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1741-1756, July.
    10. Hiroko Kamide, 2021. "The Effect of Social Cohesion on Interest, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of a Driving Assistance System in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    11. Tremblay, Crystal & Gutberlet, Jutta & Peredo, Ana Maria, 2010. "United We Can: Resource recovery, place and social enterprise," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(7), pages 422-428.
    12. Bangkim Kshetrimayum & Ronita Bardhan & Tetsu Kubota, 2020. "Factors Affecting Residential Satisfaction in Slum Rehabilitation Housing in Mumbai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Elena del Barrio & Sandra Pinzón & Sara Marsillas & Francisco Garrido, 2021. "Physical Environment vs. Social Environment: What Factors of Age-Friendliness Predict Subjective Well-Being in Men and Women?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Haiping Xu & Chuqiao Zhang & Yawen Huang, 2023. "Social trust, social capital, and subjective well-being of rural residents: micro-empirical evidence based on the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Jones, Alasdair & Goodman, Anna & Roberts, Helen & Steinbach, Rebecca & Green, Judith, 2013. "Entitlement to concessionary public transport and wellbeing: A qualitative study of young people and older citizens in London, UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 202-209.
    16. Annette Meng & Iben L. Karlsen & Vilhelm Borg & Thomas Clausen, 2021. "Development of a Questionnaire for Measuring Employees’ Perception of Selection, Optimisation and Compensation at the Leadership, Group and Individual Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. María Ángeles Molina-Martínez & Sara Marsillas & María Sánchez-Román & Elena del Barrio, 2022. "Friendly Residential Environments and Subjective Well-Being in Older People with and without Help Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Daniel R. Y. Gan & Grand H.-L. Cheng & Tze Pin Ng & Xinyi Gwee & Chang Yuan Soh & John Chye Fung & Im Sik Cho, 2022. "Neighborhood Makes or Breaks Active Ageing? Findings from Cross-Sectional Path Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-10, March.
    19. Ling Zhang & Junfeng Jiang & Peigang Wang, 2021. "Social cohesion associated with health mediated by emotional experience and life satisfaction: Evidence from the internal migrants in China," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 1285-1303, June.
    20. Elisabetta Pietrostefani, 2022. "Urban Transformations and Complex Values: Insights From Beirut," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 142-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:270:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621000149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.