IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i3p351-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress-coping in migraine

Author

Listed:
  • Sorbi, Marjolijn
  • Tellegen, Bert

Abstract

During a total of six months weekly measurements of coping with every-day life stresses were obtained from 29 migraine patients. Four issues were investigated: (1) the relation between daily stresses and the occurence of migraine attacks; (2) the associations between ways of stress-coping and attack occurence; (3) the effects on stress-coping of two behavior therapeutic methods, relaxation training and stress-coping training; (4) the clinical utility of pre-training measurement of stress-coping. The results yield evidence that both threat as a form of every-day stress and 'depressive reaction' as a way to cope with threat are significantly related to the occurence of migraine attacks. In general the effects of training on stress-coping appeared to be rather small. Three coping strategies changed as a result of both regimens taken together: 'tackling the problem actively' increased, while 'avoidance' and (quite tenuous) 'depressive reaction' decreased. Although relaxation training contributed most to these outcomes, no significant between-group differences were found. Divergent baseline per-subject patterns of stress-coping suggest that individual differences must be acknowledged. A sensible clinical usage of stress-coping data in our view requires that inferences are based on individual rather than group outcomes. Also, one cannot afford to neglect the actual and often idiosyncratic context of stress-coping.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorbi, Marjolijn & Tellegen, Bert, 1988. "Stress-coping in migraine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 351-358, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:351-358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90400-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:351-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.